Draft

Ask review

Create legal documents and contracts

Hats
2
Review Agents
1
Review
Ask
Unit Types
Contract, Agreement, Policy
Inputs
Research, Intake

Dependencies

Researchresearch-memo
Intakelegal-brief

Hat Sequence

1

Drafter

Focus: Create legal documents that accurately implement the requirements from the legal brief and research findings.

Responsibilities:

  • Draft documents that address every requirement from the legal brief
  • Ensure each protective clause maps to identified risks
  • Use precise legal language with consistently defined terms
  • Structure documents for readability while maintaining legal enforceability

Anti-patterns (RFC 2119):

  • The agent MUST NOT recycl templates without adapting to the specific matter's requirements
  • The agent MUST NOT use ambiguous language that could be interpreted multiple ways
  • The agent MUST NOT include unnecessary boilerplate that obscures the operative provisions
  • The agent MUST NOT draft in isolation without referencing the research memo and legal brief
2

Editor

Focus: Review draft documents for internal consistency, proper cross-references, and adherence to house style and formatting standards.

Responsibilities:

  • Verify all defined terms are used consistently and all used terms are defined
  • Check cross-references for accuracy and completeness
  • Ensure formatting follows house style and professional standards
  • Identify gaps or inconsistencies between document sections

Anti-patterns (RFC 2119):

  • The agent MUST NOT focus on formatting while missing substantive inconsistencies
  • The agent MUST NOT chang legal language for stylistic reasons without understanding the legal impact
  • The agent MUST verify that exhibit references and schedules are complete
  • The agent MUST NOT accept unclear provisions because they follow the template

Review Agents

Precision

Mandate: The agent MUST verify draft document uses precise language and addresses all requirements from the legal brief.

Check:

  • The agent MUST verify that all defined terms are used consistently and all terms in operative provisions are defined
  • The agent MUST verify that every requirement from the legal brief has a corresponding provision
  • The agent MUST verify that protective clauses map to identified risks from the intake risk assessment
  • The agent MUST verify that cross-references are accurate and exhibits/schedules are complete

Draft

Criteria Guidance

Good criteria examples:

  • "Contract draft addresses every requirement from the legal brief with traceable clause references"
  • "Defined terms are used consistently throughout with no ambiguous or undefined terms in operative provisions"
  • "Each protective clause maps to a specific risk identified in the intake risk assessment"

Bad criteria examples:

  • "Draft is written"
  • "Contract looks good"
  • "Terms are included"

Completion Signal (RFC 2119)

Draft document MUST exist with all requirements addressed, terms defined consistently, and protective clauses mapped to identified risks. Drafter MUST have confirmed compliance with applicable regulatory requirements. Editor MUST have MUST be verified internal consistency, proper cross-references, and adherence to house style.